by
Michael A. Jeannot
Department of Chemistry, St. Cloud State University
with contributions by
Christa Colyer, Wake Forest University; William Feighery, Indiana University South Bend; Edward Acheson, Millikin University; and Peter Balanda, Ferris State University
"Wow, I can't believe baby Maggie is already two weeks old!" exclaimed Bob.
"I know; I'm so glad you could get time off work to come here to the doctor for her checkup," replied Bob's wife, Julia. "How are things going at BB Plastics?"
Bob's answer was interrupted by Maggie as she started to fuss in the waiting room. Bob promptly got out the bottle of formula and started feeding Maggie.
"Bob, what are these bottles made from?" Julia inquired. Julia had recently read an article in a magazine which discussed possible health problems for babies fed with plastic bottles.
"They're made from polycarbonate," replied Bob. "In fact, we make this stuff at BB Plastics. It is very impact resistant, transparent, and has been used for years in the food industry."
"Yeah, polycarbonate, that's the type of material I read about in the article. I'm concerned, Bob; maybe we shouldn't be using these types of bottles?"
"But the Food and Drug Administration and other organizations have stood by polycarbonate for years. Why all the concern now?" retorted Bob.
"Well, I read that the polycarbonate bottles can produce some compound that disrupts the endocrine system - I think it was called bisphenol-A. I don't think the levels were very high, but should we take the chance?"
Once again, Bob was interrupted, this time by Dr. Bill who was now ready to see Maggie. At the completion of the exam, Dr. Bill asked if there were any other concerns.
"Nope," replied Bob.
Julia looked unsure. "Well, I do have one concern...."
Study Questions (things to think about as you read the references below)
Readings
Disclaimer: The story presented in this case study
and the characters in it are fictitious. The case itself is based on data
reported in the literature--data that are available for public scrutiny
and comment. There is no intent to "find fault" or present an opinion pro
or con. Judgement is in the domain of the scientific community. Every
effort has been made to present the scientific considerations concisely
and accurately. Any errors should be attributed to the author Michael
Jeannot and not the original investigators.
Posted: 9/3/99
nas Last Revised: 04/17/03
nas
This file is also available in Adobe Portable Document Format
(PDF).
Copyright © 2003 by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science. Please see our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning permissible reproduction of this work.