 |
CASE TEACHING NOTES
for
"Genetic Testing and Breast Cancer:
Is a Little Knowledge a Dangerous Thing?"
by
Charlotte R. Zales, Education Department Moravian College, Bethlehem, PA
Joseph C. Colosi, Biology Department DeSales University, Center Valley, PA |
 |
INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND
Genetic testing informs individuals about aspects of their genetic makeup that may indicate they are at risk for particular diseases. This case introduces students to genetic testing and illustrates its advantages and disadvantages in the context of a person at risk for breast cancer. The case scenario presents a dilemma about genetic testing requiring a decision about whether or not to get tested for known mutations in the breast cancer genes.
As scientists discover information about genetics, those who use the information need to analyze related issues. This case is appropriate for students in fields associated with genetics. The case is also well suited for students interested in bioinformatics, a new field of study that combines biology and information technology. Bioinformatics is used to analyze large databases of information, such as those resulting from the Human Genome Project. In addition, the case is appropriate for science or pre-med students studying biology or disease prevention, and for students studying ethical decision-making. A valuable aspect of this case is its illustration of how to make decisions: how to analyze aspects of a decision and how to debate their relative merit. In this context, the case is appropriate for all students.
We have taught this case successfully in several different contexts. We used the case in a summer bioinformatics program with high school senior women who were planning to major in science in college. In addition, we presented the case to college freshmen taking an introduction to biology course for non-majors and to college juniors majoring in biology.
A person has many factors to consider in deciding whether to get tested. Each time we have run the case, we ask students initially and then again at the conclusion of the case if they would be tested. We have different proportions of students deciding "yes" or "no" initially, with many changing their mind after the case is run. As with many decisions, it is never simple, and the case presents important factors—some clearly in favor, some clearly opposed, and some mixed—about genetic testing.
Each time we have presented the case, one or more students have approached us and thanked us for the information and the discussion. Frequently, they have told us about a friend or relative with breast cancer, and how this discussion has enhanced their understanding of the disease.
Objectives
As outcomes of studying this case, students will:
- formulate a decision for or against genetic testing, taking into consideration various kinds of information, for a particular individual; and
- defend their decision by explaining the rationale, in the context of a particular individual.
While formulating and defending their decisions, students will also:
- analyze genetic testing and its role in maintaining health;
- examine disease prevention strategies, including diet, exercise, and stress reduction;
- critique the effect of obtaining genetic information on employment and health insurance and on personal decisions; and
- calculate the impact of obtaining genetic information on families, medical knowledge, and society.
MAJOR ISSUES
This case presents information about five issues that impact the decision to be tested for genetic information. The five issues are:
- the nature of the information available through genetic and DNA analysis;
- genetic testing as a means to information;
- insurance and employment risks as a result of genetic testing;
- healthy eating, aerobic exercise, and stress reduction as means of reducing risk of disease; and
- ethical decisions related to genetic testing.
During the case, students role-play, taking on the viewpoint of five characters, each representing one of the issues. Information about these issues is presented on the five Role-Play Sheets that accompany the case. Once the students have studied their Role-Play Sheets, they have sufficient and accurate information to discuss the dilemma and reach a decision. The information is presented on the Role-Play Sheets in outline form so that students can access it easily during discussion.
Teachers may choose to have students supplement the Role-Play Sheets using the resources listed below or other sources of information. This may be most appropriate after the case is run to enrich and extend students' knowledge.
CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
Students will engage in a role-play activity in cooperative learning groups. A K-W-L chart will facilitate organization of information.
Role-Playing
Role-playing enables students to examine ideas from different viewpoints. By taking on the role of a particular character representing a specific issue, students gain understanding of the knowledge that generates the character's viewpoint. Whether or not the student agrees with the position of the role he or she plays, the student comprehends the rationale for the viewpoint.
K-W-L Chart
The K-W-L chart (see Figure 1) keeps information organized.
- The K column will be filled with what students KNOW after reading the dilemma.
- The W column will be filled with what students WANT to learn in order to reach a decision.
- The L column will be filled with what was LEARNED after discussion.
The K-W-L chart is beneficial in several ways.
- While filling the K column, students confirm that they understand what they have read.
- While filling the W column, students can pose their own questions of what they want to know.
- After the L column is filled in, students realize that all their questions may not have been answered. They are motivated to do additional research.
- After the L column is filled in, students may pose new questions. This illustrates for them the iterative process of learning.
Cooperative Learning
Cooperative learning groups ensure that all students participate actively and equitably. The jigsaw method enhances cooperative learning by making each student responsible for teaching a portion of material to his or her group (see Figure 2).
Jigsaw method places students into two different groups. For this case, they are called Role Groups and Book Club Groups.
This case begins with students sitting in five Role Groups. Each Role Group is assigned a portion of the material to learn. The portion is one of the five issues. Students take on the role of the character that represents the issue. Students learn about and discuss their issue to ensure that they understand it. Students analyze its impact on a decision to get tested.
Then the Role Groups break apart—jigsaw—and reassemble as Book Club Groups. Book Club Groups are composed of one student from each Role Group. The students in a Book Club Group represent all of the five issues. In Book Club Groups, students teach their portion of the material to each other. In Book Club Groups, students learn about and discuss all the issues, and weigh their relative impact on a decision.
Directions and Script for Presenters
Before running the case, we recommend the following steps.
- Prepare copies of the case, enough for every student.
- Prepare copies of the Role-Play Sheets. Each Role Group will get copies of one of the Role-Play Sheets.
- Label the Role-Play Sheets within each Role Group 1, 2, 3, etc. These numbers will direct students from Role Groups to Book Club Groups during the case (see Figure 3).
- Prepare a K-W-L chart for chalkboard or overhead (see Figure 1).
- Prepare packets with all five Role-Play Sheets to distribute at the end of the case.
Note: Suggested verbal script is bulleted below. All other text indicates directions and information for the facilitator.
I. Introduction
|
A. Introduce yourself (if needed).
B. Place students into five groups.
Cooperative learning groups are usually arranged to be as heterogeneous as possible, based on academic ability, gender, and ethnicity (see Group Assignment Details for additional information).
C. Explain DNA and the Human Genome Project.
Introduce bioinformatics.
- Bioinformatics is a new scientific field that combines biology and information technology.
- It is used for analyzing databases of genetic information, such as the information from the Human Genome Project.
- It is used by researchers and pharmaceutical companies.
Expand this introduction as appropriate for the students.
D. Introduce role-playing.
- You are going to read a true story that presents a dilemma about genetic testing that we will discuss and try to resolve.
- Our objectives are:
- to discuss issues related to genetic testing,
- to analyze information about the issues, and
- to propose a decision about whether or not to get tested.
E. Distribute the case and tell students to read it.
F. Place a K-W-L chart on overhead or chalkboard (see Figure 1).
Ask:
- What do we KNOW about the dilemma? [list under K column]
- What do we WANT to know to help us reach a decision? [list under W column]
You may need to prompt students if there are important ideas they do not suggest.
G. Call for an initial decision.
- Based on what you know, if you were Kathy and had to decide to be tested or not, right now, what would you decide?
Have students record their own vote.
|
II. Role Groups
|
A. Give each Role Group copies of one of the Role-Play Sheets, one for each student (see Figure 3).
- Each group will take on the role of one of the characters in the case.
- Each character has expertise about an issue and will help Kathy make a decision.
- The characters are:
- Martha—Researcher at a Pharmaceutical Company
- John—Father of Three Adopted Children
- Sarah—Daughter of a Man who had Huntington's Disease
- Peter—Yoga Instructor
- Mary—Minister
- Study the information that the character you represent would know. All of the information on your Role-Play Sheet is factual information about the issue related to your role.
- Take on the assigned role.
- Discuss the issue so that everyone in your group is knowledgeable about it.
- Make a decision for or against genetic testing that your character would support.
- Then discuss together what advice your character would give to Kathy and the rationale for the advice.
- Discussion should proceed around the group, with all students participating in turn.
B. Circulate while Role Groups discuss their issue.
Sit with Role Groups. Listen to their discussion, answer questions, and pose questions. You are functioning as a facilitator.
|
III. Book Club Groups
|
A. Have students "jigsaw" to Book Club Groups (see Figure 2).
- We are going to move into new groups. Notice the number (1, 2, 3, etc.) on the top of your Role-Play Sheet.
Instruct students where to congregate for Group 1, Group 2, Group 3, etc.
- As you are seated now, each group represents Kathy's Book Club. Each group has all five characters. Each Book Club Group will help Kathy make a decision.
- In your Book Club Group, each of you in turn is going to present the information and viewpoint of your character to your Book Club Group.
- Everyone needs to understand the relevance of all the issues and appreciate their significance.
- Then discuss within your Book Club Group what advice you would give Kathy. As each of you participates in the discussion, weigh the information presented by all the characters.
Allow time for each Book Club Group to reach a decision.
Circulate while Book Club Groups discuss the roles.
Sit with Book Club Groups. Listen to their discussion, answer questions, and pose questions.
B. Call for everyone's attention, to conduct a class discussion.
Have each Book Club Group select a spokesperson.
Sit on a chair facing the groups. Assume the role of Kathy.
- I'm Kathy. I have to make a decision and I want to hear your advice.
- I'd like to hear from the spokesperson of each group in turn. Tell me your decision and your reasons for making it.
The spokesperson from each Book Club Group presents its decision and rationale to the class.
- Now that I have heard from each Book Club Group, any person may join in to add their ideas and viewpoint to the discussion. Be sure to support your statements.
C. De-brief.
- Let's list what we have learned.
Use the K-W-L chart. List, under L, what have we LEARNED.
|
IV. Closure
|
A. Call for a final decision.
- Vote—what would you, as yourself, decide now about being tested.
[Have students record their own vote.]
Ask students to compare their new choice with their initial choice. Compare totals for and against testing, from both the original and the final tally. Also, record how many students made a change.
Frequently, the class will be evenly decided between "get tested" and "do not get tested," both at the start and the end of the case, with many individual changes occurring.
Students may share their reasons for changing or not changing.
B. Summary.
- Tell one thing new you learned. Tell something you learned from a role other than your own role that helped you to make your individual decision.
Discuss the fact that the decision is complex and may be different for different people, based on their particular circumstances.
Give each student a packet with all five Role-Play Sheets.
|
V. Extending Activities
|
Educators may elect for students to conduct additional research on the issues raised by their role to enhance and extend learning.
An additional question to ask when students conduct their own research is: "How reliable do you judge, for example, Peter's information to be, and why?" This question, posed for each role, encourages students to evaluate the information.
Students may consult various resources to resolve questions that arose during the activity and to learn more about various aspects of genetic testing.
Students can be asked to write an opinion paper as an assignment, stating their personal opinion and defending it with information from the case and additional researched sources. This will further develop analysis skills.
The K-W-L chart can be used reiteratively. Students list what they now KNOW, and what they now WANT to learn.
|
|
- Assigning students to groups:
To follow cooperative learning guidelines, you will plan group composition ahead of time.
Alternately, you may form random groups by having students count off (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) to form the five groups.
- When the number of students in the class does not divide evenly by 5:
Assign the additional students to the five Role Groups evenly.
- When students move to Book Club Groups:
Assign the additional students to the Book Club Groups evenly.
This results in a few Book Club Groups with two students representing one of the characters. The two students will both present information about their issue.
REFERENCES
Listed below are books, articles, and web sites are organized in relation to the five roles. Note that many entries will contain information pertaining to other roles as well. Web sites in particular may be explored for additional information about all aspects.
Genetics, DNA Analysis, Bioinformatics
- National Breast Cancer Centre
deFazio, A. 1997-98 (Summer). New evidence on the function of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Breast News: Newsletter of the NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre 3(4).
http://www.nbcc.org.au/pages/info/resource/nbccpubs/brnews/98sum/sum4.htm
- National Cancer Institute
The 185delAG alteration in BRCA1: What does this mean for Jewish women?
http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cancernet/400120.html
- NCBI
The Human Gene Map: Featured Gene
Breast cancer.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/SCIENCE96/gene?BRCA1
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/SCIENCE96/gene?BRCA2
- University of Pennsylvania Medical Center
BRCA1 limits cancers by triggering the cell cycle inhibitor p21
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/1997-09/UoPM-BLCB-100997.php
BRCA1 cancer gene plays pivotal role in DNA control complex.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2000-07/WI-Bcgp-2007100.php
- University of Washington, Seattle
Culver, J. B., J. Hull, E. Levy-Lahad, M. Daly, and W. Burke. 2000 (March 4). BRCA1 and BRCA2 hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Seattle: University of Washington.
http://www.geneclinics.org/profiles/brca1/details.html
- Collins, F.S. 1996. BRCA1—Lots of mutations, lots of dilemmas. New England Journal of Medicine 334(3):86-188.
- Healy, B. 1997. BRCA genes—Bookmaking, fortunetelling, and medical care. New England Journal of Medicine 336(20):1448-1449.
- Love, S. M. 1995. Dr. Susan Love's Breast Book (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
- Rowell, S., B. Newman, J. Boyd, and M-C. King. 1994. Inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer. American Journal of Human Genetics 55:861-865.
- Rosenthal, M.S. 1996. The Breast Sourcebook. Los Angeles, CA: Lowell House.
- University of Washington, Seattle
Culver, J.B., J. Hull, E. Levy-Lahad, M. Daly, and W. Burke. 2000 (March). BRCA1 and BRCA2 hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Seattle: University of Washington.
http://www.geneclinics.org/profiles/brca1/details.html
Genetic Testing as a Means to Information
- Abington Memorial Hospital
Breast and ovarian cancer risk program. Cancer risk assessment programs.
http://www.amh.org/hlthsvs/ccbocrp.htm
- The Breast Center at Johns Hopkins
Breast and ovarian surveillance service (BOSS). What you should know about genetic testing.
http://www.gene-watch.org/programs/privacy/liberties-phil.html
- Genetic Health
Danziger, K. 2000 (September 5). Am I at risk?
http://www.genetichealth.com/BROV_Assessing_Your_Risk.shtml
Fergus, K. 2000 (November 14). Considering genetic testing.
http://www.genetichealth.com/BROV_Genetic_Testing_for_Breast_and_Ovarian_Cancer.shtml
Fergus, K., and J. Simonsen. 2000 (August 23). Breast and ovarian cancer in the Ashkenazi Jewish population.
http://www.genetichealth.com/BROV_GEN_of_BROV_In_ASHJ.shtml
Fergus, K., and J. Simonsen. 2000 (August 24). Genes can cause breast and ovarian cancer.
http://www.genetichealth.com/BROV_Gen_of_BROV_Cancer.shtml
Fergus, K., and J. Simonsen. 2000 (September 11). The testing process in the Ashkenazi Jewish population.
http://www.genetichealth.com/BROV_Genetic_Testing_in_People_of_Ashkenazi_Jewish_Descent.shtml
- Georgetown University. National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature.
Genetic testing and genetic screening (Scope Note 22). Washington, DC.
http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/scopenotes/sn22.html
- Grody, W.W. 2001 (August). Determining risk for cystic fibrosis: Carrier parents may be the key. GeneLetter 2(17).
http://www.geneletter.com/08-15-01/features/cfcarrierrisk.html
- Minnesota Department of Health: Health Technology Advisory Committee
Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast cancer. (1998, June)
http://www.health.state.mn.us/htac/gt.htm
- National Institutes of Health
Genetic testing for cystic fibrosis. 1997 (April). NIH Consensus Statement Online 15(4):1-37.
http://odp.od.nih.gov/consensus/cons/106/106_statement.htm
- North Dakota State University
Saha, M.C. 1998. Human genetic screening.
http://www.cc.ndsu.nodak.edu/instruct/mcclean/plsc431/students98/saha.htm
- University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center: OncoLink.
Stopfer, J. 2001. To test or not to test? Genetic counseling is the key.
http://www.oncolink.com/templates/types/article.cfm?c=3&s=5&ss=35&id=1727
Stopfer, J. 2001. Testing for BRCA1.
http://www.oncolink.com/templates/experts/article.cfm?c=3&s=13&ss=22&id=1190
- The University of Texas, The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.
On the horizon - Genetic testing takes cancer screening to new heights.
http://www3.mdanderson.org/~conquest/spring1998/testing.htm
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Harben, K. 2000. Breast cancer detection rates by race and ethnicity show importance of screening for all age groups.
http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2000pres/20001012a.html
- Roberts, L. 1990. To test or not to test? Science 247:17-19.
- Statement of the American Society of Human Genetics on genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition. (1994). American Journal of Human Genetics, 55, i-iv.
http://www.faseb.org/genetics/ashg/policy/pol-11.htm
- National Breast Cancer Coalition.
The National Breast Cancer Coalition. (1995, September). Presymptomatic genetic testing for heritable breast cancer risk.
http://www.cancer.gov/templates/doc.aspx?viewid=3C5EFFC8-7047-464E-9A44-CE02E92D0DE3
- Genetics & IVF Institute
Schulman, J. D., and H.J. Stern. 1996. Genetic predisposition testing for breast cancer. Reprinted from The Cancer Journal from Scientific American.
http://www.givf.com/cancer_journal.cfm
Insurance/Employment Risks and Related Legislation
- American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
Genetic screening in the workplace.
http://www.acoem.org/position/statements.asp?CATA_ID=11
- American Civil Liberties Union
ACLU welcomes effort to force vote on legislation to ban genetic discrimination. 2000.
http://www.aclu.org/news/2000/n062100a.html
- Workplace rights. (2000).
http://www.aclu.org/WorkplaceRights/WorkplaceRights.cfm?ID=9075&c=180
- Biospheres: The University of Oregon Undergraduate Journal of Biology Research and Teaching. (1995, Spring). III(1).
Stawicki, S. Pros of genetic screening.
http://biology.uoregon.edu/Biology_WWW/Biospheres/winter95/GeneticS/G.ScreenPros.html
Albertson, T. Cons of genetic screening.
http://biology.uoregon.edu/Biology_WWW/Biospheres/winter95/GeneticS/G.Screencons.html
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
HIPAA Insurance Reform. (2002). What is HIPAA?
http://cms.hhs.gov/hipaa/hipaa1/content/more.asp
HIPAA Insurance Reform. (2002). Consumer questions and answers about HIPAA.
http://cms.hhs.gov/hipaa/hipaa1/content/qa-con.asp#1
HIPAA Insurance Reform. (2002). Employer questions and answers about HIPAA.
http://cms.hhs.gov/hipaa/hipaa1/content/qa-emp.asp
- CNN
Levine, J. (1996, April 28). Gene research holds both promise and perils.
http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9604/28/cancer.gene/index.html
President to bar genetic discrimination. (2000, February 8).
http://europe.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/02/08/clinton.genetics/
- The Council for Responsible Genetics
Bereano, P. Don't take liberties with our genes.
http://www.gene-watch.org/programs/privacy/liberties-phil.html
Genetic discrimination. A Position paper presented by the Council for Responsible Genetics.
http://www.gene-watch.org/programs/geneticdisc/gd_pp.html
Genetic discrimination and privacy.
http://www.gene-watch.org/programs/privacy.html
Genetic discrimination legislation in the United States, June, 2001.
http://www.gene-watch.org/programs/geneticdisc/summary01.html
- Department of Labor, Department of Health and Human Services: The National Human Genome Research Institute.
Genetic information and the workplace. (1998, January).
http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/HGP/Reports/genetics_workplace.html
- Hadassah (http://capwiz.com/hadassah/issues/)
President Expresses Support for Genetic Nondiscrimination Legislation: Effort to Pass Critical Legislation Gains Momentum. (March, 2002).
http://capwiz.com/hadassah/issues/alert/?alertid=316081
- Institute for Health Care Research and Policy Georgetown University
Health privacy project: Medical privacy stories. (2002).
http://www.healthprivacy.org/info-url_nocat2302/info-url_nocat.htm
- Jewish Bulletin of Northern California
Kurtzman, D. 1997. Clinton backs plan to bar insurers from genetic bans.
http://www.jewishsf.com/bk970912/usbacks.htm
- Matloff, E.T., H. Shapell, K. Brierley, B.A. Bernhardt, W. McKinnon, and B.N. Peshkin. 2000. What would you do? Specialists' perspectives on cancer genetic testing, prophylactic surgery, and insurance discrimination. Journal of Clinical Oncology 18(12):2484-2492.
- National Organization for Rare Disorders
Issue brief: Genetic Nondiscrimination in Health Insurance and Employment Act S.318/H.R. 602.
http://www.rarediseases.org/nord/washington/washington/employmentact
- PBS Online NewsHour
A look at the ethics behind testing for genetic diseases.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/health/jan-june01/genetest_06-07.html
- Repa, B. K. Of genes and pink slips: Genetic testing goes to work.
http://www.hrlawinfo.com/lawguide/Privacy/genetic_testing_at_work.asp
- The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Policy guidance on Executive Order 13145: To prohibit discrimination in federal employment based on genetic information.
http://www.eeoc.gov/docs/guidance-genetic.html
Questions and answers: EEOC policy guidance on Executive Order 13145 prohibiting discrimination in federal employment based on genetic information.
http://www.eeoc.gov/docs/qanda-genetic.html
- US Government
H.R. 602, The Genetic Nondiscrimination in Health Insurance and Employment Act
http://www.house.gov/slaughter/leg-record/leg602.htm
- Yale-New Haven Hospital
Matloff, E. T. (1999). Confidentiality and cancer genetic testing.
http://www.ynhh.org/healthlink/cancer/cancer_12_99.html
Nutrition, Exercise, Stress Reduction
- American Cancer Society
At a glance: Nutrition and physical activities
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_3_2X_Recommendations.asp?sitearea=PED
Common questions about diet and cancer.
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_3_2X_Common_Questions_About_Diet_
and_Cancer.asp
Radiation exposure and cancer
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_1_3X_Radiation_Exposure_and_Cancer.asp
?sitearea=PED
Teenage smoking linked to breast cancer
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/NWS_1_1x_Teenage_Smoking_Linked_To_
Breast_Cancer.asp
The complete guide: Nutrition and physical activity
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_3_2X_Diet_and_Activity_Factors_That_
Affect_Risks.asp
Tobacco and cancer
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ped/ped_10.asp?sitearea=ped&level=1
What are the risk factors for breast cancer?
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/cri/content/cri_2_4_2x_what_are_the_risk_factors_for_
breast_cancer_5.asp
- CANCERcare
Managing your cancer.
http://www.cfr.epi.uci.edu/ic_registries/colon_abstracts/esplen_-TO-1299-01.htm
- American Cancer Society
Common questions about diet and cancer
http://www.cancer.org/eprise/main/docroot/PED/content/PED_3_2X_Common_Questions_About_Diet_and_Cancer?sitearea=PED
- Cancer Research Foundation of America: Women's health
http://www.preventcancer.org/healthyliving/women/index.cfm
- my.webmd.com
Body Fat Increases Cancer Risk
http://my.webmd.com/living_better_content/dnn/article/2731.2236
Weiss, Marisa. Living Beyond Breast Cancer
http://my.webmd.com/content/article/1662.56576
- National Cancer Institutes
Eat 5 A Day for Better Health
http://www.5aday.gov/
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center: Cancer Prevention: Nutrition Services
http://www.cancer.med.umich.edu/learn/nutrprev.htm
- Bonadona, V., P. Saltel, F. Desseigne, H. Mignotte, J-C. Saurin, Q. Wang, et al. (2002). Cancer patients who experienced diagnostic genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Reactions and behavior after the disclosure of a positive test result. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 11, 97-104.
http://www.jco.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/10/2135
- Borysenko, J. 1987. Minding the Body, Mending the Mind. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
- Bricklin, M. 1993. Prevention Magazine's Nutrition Advisor: The Ultimate Guide to the Health-Boosting and Health-Harming Factors in Your Diet. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press.
- Hatherill, J.R. 1998. Eat to Beat Cancer. Renaissance Books.
- Dorval, M., A.F. Patenaude, K.A. Schneider, S.A. Kieffer, L. DiGianni, K.J. Kalkbrenner, et al. (2000). Anticipated versus actual emotional reactions to disclosure of results of genetic tests for cancer susceptibility: Findings from p53 and BRCA1 testing programs. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(10), 2135-2142.
http://www.jco.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/10/2135
- Lerman, C., R.T. Croyle, K.P. Tercyak, and H. Hamann. (2002). Genetic testing: Psychological aspects and implications. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 70(3), 784-797.
- Naparstek, B. 1994. Staying Well with Guided Imagery. New York: Warner Books.
- Northrup, C. 1998. Women's Bodies, Women's Wisdom. New York: Bantam Books.
- Potter, J. F. 1998. How to Improve Your Odds Against Cancer. Lifetime Books, Inc.
- Prospero, L., M. Seminsky, J. Honeyford, B. Doan, E. Franssen, W. Meschino, et al. (2001). CMAJ, 164(7).
http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/165/6/740-a
- Schwartz, M. D., B.N. Peshkin, C. Hughes, D. Main, C. Isaacs, and C. Lerman. (2002). Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(2), 514-520.
http://www.jco.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/10/10/2135
- Thune, I., T. Brenn, E. Lund, and M. Gaard. 1997. Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine 336(18).
Ethical Decision Making and Psychological Factors
Teaching with K-W-L
- Marzano, R.J., and D.J. Pickering. 1991. Dimensions of learning: An integrative instructional framework. In Costa, A.L. (ed.) Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking (Rev. Ed., Vol. 1, pp. 94-99). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- McKenna, M. C., and R.D. Robinson. 2002. Teaching Through Text: Reading and Writing in the Content Areas (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Ogle, D. 1986. The K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher 39:564-576.
[Note: Ogle developed the K-W-L strategy.]
Teaching with Cooperative Learning Jigsaw Method
- Aronson, E., and E. Goode. 1980. Training teachers to implement jigsaw learning: A manual for teachers. In Cooperation in Education, ed. S. Sharan, P. Hare, C.D. Webb, and R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, 47-81. Provo, UT: Brigham University Press.
- Colosi, J., and C.R. Zales. 1998. Jigsaw cooperative learning improves biology lab courses. BioScience 48(2):118-124.
- Johnson, D.W., and R.T. Johnson. 1994. Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Kagan, S. 1994. Cooperative Learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teaching.
- Slavin, R.E. 1995. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Zales, C.R., and J. Colosi. 1996. Cooperative learning in the microbiology laboratory. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching 7(1):127-161.
Acknowledgements: This case study was developed with support from The Pew Charitable Trusts as part of the Case Studies in Science workshop held at the University at Buffalo, State University of New York, on June 11-15, 2001.
Go back to the case
Image Credit: The BCRA1 and BCRA2 genes map, respectively, to chromosomes 17 and 13. Illustrations from the National Center for Biotechnology Information.
Date Posted: 07/31/02 nas. Revised 03/10/03.
This file is also available in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). 