CASE TEACHING NOTES
for
The Dating Game

by
Shoshana Tobias and Clyde Freeman Herreid
University at Buffalo, State University of New York


This delightful little vignette seems no more than an incidental exercise on its surface, yet it is much more than that. It puts human fossils in a modern setting that is entirely familiar to all students -- a television show. Students attempt to determine the identity of human fossils by their characteristics described during a "quiz show." It is amusing and can be hilarious as students role-play the parts of a bachlorette trying to seek a mate in the "Dating Game" and her suitors.

The case was designed to be used in a general biology class for freshman students but clearly has other possible uses such as in an anthropology or paleontology course. I used it in a summer class of Evolutionary Biology during part of a lab session devoted to human evolution. To say that the students enjoyed it would be an understatement.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this case is to learn the major characteristics (physical and cultural) of key human fossils.

CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

This case was designed to be run in two successive class periods. At the end of one class, the case is given out to the students. We did this in small groups of students who had been working together throughout the semester. Their first job was to read the case and decide which bachelor in the script is which of the three hominids, Homo sapiens, Australopithecus africanus, and Homo erectus. In this exercise it is useful to ask the students to first list each bachelor's characteristics described in the script, and then decide which hominid is which. It works well if the instructor uses this time to review any points about evolution that are germane.

As homework, all students must fill out a CONTESTANT APPLICATION FORM (which will be graded) in preparation for the next class. Also, the instructor will assign specific roles to each of the groups.

  1. One group will be the Bachelorette Group. They are responsible for writing 10 game show questions that will give the students clues as to each bachelor's identity and "mate potential." They also fill out contestant applications.

  2. One group will be the Bachelors Group (3 or 4 in number). Assign a different hominid type to each bachelor. Each bachelor is responsible for filling out a contestant application form matching his hominid type as well as a short one-paragraph introduction for the host, including: occupation, location, hobbies, and main goal or dream. Try to assign hominids which are as different as possible to avoid student confusion; for example, A. afarensis, H. habilis, and H. neanderthalensis. Write the names of assigned hominids on the board. BACHELORS SHOULD NOT REVEAL WHICH HOMINID TYPE THEY ARE REPRESENTING, SINCE STUDENTS WILL BE ASKED TO FIGURE THAT INFORMATION OUT FROM THE SHOW.

  3. The other groups will represent the TV Audience. Each group is responsible for filling out the contestant application forms for the hominids written on the board, as well as any additional hominids you assign them. This way each group will have a complete set of hominid profiles to share -- one hominid per student -- for example, in group 1, which has four students, there will be one of each of these types: A. afarensis, A. robustus, H. habilis, and H. neanderthalensis, as shown below for Group 1. The table below shows how this would work for each of the groups:

    Group #1
    (4 students)

    A. afarensis

    A. robustus

    H. habilis

    H. neanderthalensis

    Group #2
    (5 students)

    A. afarensis

    A. robustus

    H. habilis

    H. neanderthalensis

    AND A. africanus

    Group #3
    (5 students)

    A. afarensis

    A. robustus

    H. habilis

    H. neanderthalensis

    AND A. boisei

    Group #4
    (5 students)

    A. afarensis

    A. robustus

    H. habilis

    H. neanderthalensis

    AND H. erectus

    *NOTE: We have adopted the position here of assuming that the Neanderthals are a distinct species rather than a subspecies of H. sapiens. This point should be discussed as the students will surely uncover the problem once they delve into the literature.

    In the second class period, a representative from the bachelorettes' group is selected by that group to be on the "game show." She sits on a stool in the front of the room. The three or four bachelors (perhaps with their notes in hand) also sit on stools in the front of the class. If a screen is handy to separate the bachelors from the bachelorette, use it to give more authenticity to the "show."

    The instructor acts as game show host. A student could play this role, but the chances for ribald behavior escalates significantly if this approach is chosen.

    Students then watch the skit as the host asks for the bachelorette's questions. The "TV audience" all keep notes for the various bachelors on the AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION HANDOUT. The instructor can decide to use questions from the audience as well.

    After the bachelorette has finished questioning the bachelors, all the students, except the bachelors, break up into their home groups to decide which hominid each bachelor represents and whom they would choose as a mate.

    After the audience votes on their favorite bachelor and labels the hominids, the host reveals the bachelorette's choice and gives the true identity of the bachelors. Then the game ends and the instructor can lead a discussion on why the student chose as they did and consider relevant topics of hominid evolution.

    Below is a summary sheet for the hominids most likely chosen.

    Category

    A. afarensis

    A. africanus

    A. boisei

    A. robustus

    Origin

    N. Ethiopia

    S. Africa

    Tanzania

    E. Africa

    Ht/wt

    M: l.5m/45kg,

    F: 1.1m/29kg

    M: 1.4m/41kg

    F:1.1m/30kg

    M: 1.4m/49kg

    F: 1.2m/34kg

    M: 1.3m/40kg

    F:1.1m/32kg

    Build

    gracile

    gracile, strong arms

    larger boned

    larger boned

    Climate/habitat

    African savanna

    Savanna/some time in trees

    Savanna

    Savanna

    Time Range

    4.0-3.0 million years ago

    3.3-2.5 mya

    2.3-1.4 mya

    1.9-1.0 mya

    Diet

    soft fruit, nuts and leaves

    soft fruit, nuts and leaves

    mainly tough fruit, seeds and nuts, occasional meat

    mainly tough fruit, seeds and nuts, opportunistic omnivore

    Use Fire?

    NO

    NO

    NO

    NO

    Tool making?

    No evidence of stone tools

    No evidence of stone tools

    No evidence of stone tools

    No evidence of stone tools

    Brain Size

    around 500 cc

    420-500 cc

    around 515 cc

    500-530 cc

    Communication Skills

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    Distinguishing characteristics

    Had smaller canines than apes. Jaw shape.

    Broad built face with large molars

    Huge jaws and teeth for chewing

    Huge jaws and teeth for chewing

    Category

    H. habilis

    H. erectus

    H. neanderthalensis

    H. sapiens (Us)

    Origin

    Kenya

    China, Europe, Africa

    Europe, Asia, Africa

    All over

    Ht/wt

    less than 5 ft, very light

    5-6ft M: 140lb

    5'3", 120-140lb

    Modern

    Build

    light human

    same as human

    very muscular

    modern

    Climate/habitat

     

    African Savanna-Cold Europe

    Cold N. Europe-Warmer Israel

    All over, esp. warmer regions

    Time Range

    2.0-1.6 mya

    1.5-200,000

    120,000-35,000

    100,000-now

    Diet

    marrow, scavenging, seasonal vegetation

    small game, plants, nuts fruit, some large game. Cooked

    Plants, nuts, fruit, big game animals. Cooked

    hunting, fishing, wild grains, plants, big game. Cooked

    Use Fire?

    ?

    YES

    YES

    Hearths

    YES

    Hearths

    Tool making?

    Simple stone tools

    hand axes, scrapers

    advanced, little variation

    varied material, innovation

    Brain Size

    560-700 cc

    750-1140 cc

    almost 1800 cc

    1040-1595 cc

    Communication Skills

    ?

    ?

    probably, used some ritual

    Art, language, ritual, music

    Distinguishing characteristics

    First evidence of stone tools

    Heavy brows, strong jaws and teeth

    Heavy brows, sloping forehead, large nose and lower jaw. Evidence of clothes, burial...

    Innovation, math, complex tools with regional differences and dialects. Agriculture, religion, warfare...

    Note that this information will vary depending on what source is used. These are general ranges and assumptions.

    QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

    The questions posed at the bottom of the Audience Participation Handout are useful for a class discussion and may be used for a homework assignment as a follow-up exercise. Brief answers are posted below for questions 3 and 4.

    1. What are some of the trade-offs involved in a bigger brain, bipedalism, increased gestation/longer childhood and a more omnivorous diet?

      Bigger brain: increased gestation and infant care, more difficult child birth, requires more food
      Bipedalism: easier for predators to spot above grass, loss of opposable toe, requires shift in pelvic anatomy
      Increased gestation/longer childhood: Bigger babies are harder to deliver and require more food and care on the part of adults. Off-spring are also spaced further apart, so overall birth rate decreases.
      Omnivorous diet: Cannot specialize anatomy for optimal use of one food type

    2. What are some of the benefits?

      Bigger brain: increased learning capacity, ability to adapt to new situations and problems faster gives the organism an evolutionary advantage in complex, changing environments. Language and thought.
      Bipedalism: Frees hands to carry, increased sight range, more effective when crossing large distances.
      Increased gestation/longer childhood: Stronger mother-child bond, more opportunity to pass down survival skills and knowledge between generations, increased social complexity.
      Omnivorous diet: Greater range in diet allows organisms to take advantage of more opportunities; less likely to die out with the loss of any single food source.

    SELECTED INTERNET SITES

    Acknowledgements: This case was developed with the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF Award #9752799).

    comments page Top page Isles Royal