by
Shoshana Tobias and Clyde Freeman Herreid
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
The case was designed to be used in a general biology class for freshman students but clearly has other possible uses such as in an anthropology or paleontology course. I used it in a summer class of Evolutionary Biology during part of a lab session devoted to human evolution. To say that the students enjoyed it would be an understatement.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this case is to learn the major characteristics (physical and cultural) of key human fossils.
CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
This case was designed to be run in two successive class periods. At the end of one class, the case is given out to the students. We did this in small groups of students who had been working together throughout the semester. Their first job was to read the case and decide which bachelor in the script is which of the three hominids, Homo sapiens, Australopithecus africanus, and Homo erectus. In this exercise it is useful to ask the students to first list each bachelor's characteristics described in the script, and then decide which hominid is which. It works well if the instructor uses this time to review any points about evolution that are germane.
As homework, all students must fill out a CONTESTANT APPLICATION FORM (which will be graded) in preparation for the next class. Also, the instructor will assign specific roles to each of the groups.
|
Group #1 A. afarensis A. robustus H. habilis H. neanderthalensis |
Group #2 A. afarensis A. robustus H. habilis H. neanderthalensis AND A. africanus |
Group #3 A. afarensis A. robustus H. habilis H. neanderthalensis AND A. boisei |
Group #4 A. afarensis A. robustus H. habilis H. neanderthalensis AND H. erectus |
*NOTE: We have adopted the position here of assuming that the Neanderthals are a distinct species rather than a subspecies of H. sapiens. This point should be discussed as the students will surely uncover the problem once they delve into the literature.
In the second class period, a representative from the bachelorettes' group is selected by that group to be on the "game show." She sits on a stool in the front of the room. The three or four bachelors (perhaps with their notes in hand) also sit on stools in the front of the class. If a screen is handy to separate the bachelors from the bachelorette, use it to give more authenticity to the "show."
The instructor acts as game show host. A student could play this role, but the chances for ribald behavior escalates significantly if this approach is chosen.
Students then watch the skit as the host asks for the bachelorette's questions. The "TV audience" all keep notes for the various bachelors on the AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION HANDOUT. The instructor can decide to use questions from the audience as well.
After the bachelorette has finished questioning the bachelors, all the students, except the bachelors, break up into their home groups to decide which hominid each bachelor represents and whom they would choose as a mate.
After the audience votes on their favorite bachelor and labels the hominids, the host reveals the bachelorette's choice and gives the true identity of the bachelors. Then the game ends and the instructor can lead a discussion on why the student chose as they did and consider relevant topics of hominid evolution.
Below is a summary sheet for the hominids most likely chosen.
|
Category |
A. afarensis |
A. africanus |
A. boisei |
A. robustus |
|
Origin |
N. Ethiopia |
S. Africa |
Tanzania |
E. Africa |
|
Ht/wt |
M: l.5m/45kg, F: 1.1m/29kg |
M: 1.4m/41kg F:1.1m/30kg |
M: 1.4m/49kg F: 1.2m/34kg |
M: 1.3m/40kg F:1.1m/32kg |
|
Build |
gracile |
gracile, strong arms |
larger boned |
larger boned |
|
Climate/habitat |
African savanna |
Savanna/some time in trees |
Savanna |
Savanna |
|
Time Range |
4.0-3.0 million years ago |
3.3-2.5 mya |
2.3-1.4 mya |
1.9-1.0 mya |
|
Diet |
soft fruit, nuts and leaves |
soft fruit, nuts and leaves |
mainly tough fruit, seeds and nuts, occasional meat |
mainly tough fruit, seeds and nuts, opportunistic omnivore |
|
Use Fire? |
NO |
NO |
NO |
NO |
|
Tool making? |
No evidence of stone tools |
No evidence of stone tools |
No evidence of stone tools |
No evidence of stone tools |
|
Brain Size |
around 500 cc |
420-500 cc |
around 515 cc |
500-530 cc |
|
Communication Skills |
? |
? |
? |
? |
|
Distinguishing characteristics |
Had smaller canines than apes. Jaw shape. |
Broad built face with large molars |
Huge jaws and teeth for chewing |
Huge jaws and teeth for chewing |
|
Category |
H. habilis |
H. erectus |
H. neanderthalensis |
H. sapiens (Us) |
|
Origin |
Kenya |
China, Europe, Africa |
Europe, Asia, Africa |
All over |
|
Ht/wt |
less than 5 ft, very light |
5-6ft M: 140lb |
5'3", 120-140lb |
Modern |
|
Build |
light human |
same as human |
very muscular |
modern |
|
Climate/habitat |
African Savanna-Cold Europe |
Cold N. Europe-Warmer Israel |
All over, esp. warmer regions |
|
|
Time Range |
2.0-1.6 mya |
1.5-200,000 |
120,000-35,000 |
100,000-now |
|
Diet |
marrow, scavenging, seasonal vegetation |
small game, plants, nuts fruit, some large game. Cooked |
Plants, nuts, fruit, big game animals. Cooked |
hunting, fishing, wild grains, plants, big game. Cooked |
|
Use Fire? |
? |
YES |
YES Hearths |
YES Hearths |
|
Tool making? |
Simple stone tools |
hand axes, scrapers |
advanced, little variation |
varied material, innovation |
|
Brain Size |
560-700 cc |
750-1140 cc |
almost 1800 cc |
1040-1595 cc |
|
Communication Skills |
? |
? |
probably, used some ritual |
Art, language, ritual, music |
|
Distinguishing characteristics |
First evidence of stone tools |
Heavy brows, strong jaws and teeth |
Heavy brows, sloping forehead, large nose and lower jaw. Evidence of clothes, burial... |
Innovation, math, complex tools with regional differences and dialects. Agriculture, religion, warfare... |
Note that this information will vary depending on what source is used. These are general ranges and assumptions.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
The questions posed at the bottom of the Audience Participation Handout are useful for a class discussion and may be used for a homework assignment as a follow-up exercise. Brief answers are posted below for questions 3 and 4.
Bigger brain: increased gestation and infant care, more difficult child birth, requires more food
Bipedalism: easier for predators to spot above grass, loss of opposable toe, requires shift in pelvic anatomy
Increased gestation/longer childhood: Bigger babies are harder to deliver and require more food and care on the part of adults. Off-spring are also spaced further apart, so overall birth rate decreases.
Omnivorous diet: Cannot specialize anatomy for optimal use of one food type
Bigger brain: increased learning capacity, ability to adapt to new situations and problems faster gives the organism an evolutionary advantage in complex, changing environments. Language and thought.
Bipedalism: Frees hands to carry, increased sight range, more effective when crossing large distances.
Increased gestation/longer childhood: Stronger mother-child bond, more opportunity to pass down survival skills and knowledge between generations, increased social complexity.
Omnivorous diet: Greater range in diet allows organisms to take advantage of more opportunities; less likely to die out with the loss of any single food source.
SELECTED INTERNET SITES