Lost in Space:
A Case Study in Engineering Problem-Solving

Part III: Going to Mars—The Mars Climate Orbiter Mission

by
Albert Titus
Department of Electrical Engineering
Rochester Institute of Technology


OVERVIEW OF MISSION:

  • Mission
    "Volatiles and Climate History"
  • Launch
    The orbiter was launched from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS) Space Launch Complex 17 (SLC-17) on December 11, 1998.
  • Launch Vehicle
    Boeing Delta II 7425. The upper stage consists of a spin stabilized Star 48 with a Nutation Control System and a yo-yo despin device.
  • Spacecraft Dimensions
    Main bus: 2.1 meters (6.9 feet) tall, 1.6 meters (5.4 feet) wide and 2 meters (6.4 feet) deep. Wingspan of solar array: 5.5 meters (18 feet) tip to tip.
  • Spacecraft Weight
    629 kg (1,387 pounds) total, consisting of 338 kg (745 pounds) spacecraft and 291 kg (642 pounds) fuel.
  • Science Instruments
    Mars Colar Imager (MARCI)
    Press Modulator Infrared Radiometer (PMIRR)
  • Spacecraft Power
    Solar array providing up to 1,000 watts just after launch, 500 watts at Mars.
  • Project Cost
    $327.6 million total for both orbiter and lander (not including Deep Space 2). $193.1 million for spacecraft development, $91.7 million for launch, and $42.8 million for mission operations.

STATUS:

"The MCO had been on a trajectory toward Mars since its launch on December 11, 1998. All spacecraft systems had been performing nominally until an abrupt loss of mission shortly after the start of the Mars Orbit Insertion burn on September 23, 1999. Throughout spring and summer of 1999, concerns existed at the working level regarding discrepancies observed between navigation solutions. As MCO approached Mars, three orbit determination schemes were employed. Doppler and range solutions were compared to those computed using only Doppler or range data. The Doppler-only solutions consistently indicated a flight path insertion closer to the planet. These discrepancies were not resolved.

On September 8, 1999, the final planned interplanetary Trajectory Correction Maneuver-4 (TCM-4) was computed. This maneuver was expected to adjust the trajectory such that soon after the Mars orbital insertion (MOI) burn, the first periapse altitude (point of closest approach to the planet) would be at a distance of 226km. This would have also resulted in the second periapse altitude becoming 210km, which was desired for the subsequent MCO aerobraking phase. TCM-4 was executed as planned on September 15, 1999.

Mars orbit insertion was planned on September 23, 1999. During the weeklong timeframe between TCM-4 and MOI, orbit determination processing by the operations navigation team indicated that the first periapse distance had decreased to the range of 150-170km.

During the 24 hours preceding MOI, MCO began to feel the strong effects of Mar's gravitational field and tracking data were collected to measure this and incorporate it into the orbit determination process. Approximately one hour prior to MOI, processing of this more accurate tracking data was completed. Based on these data, the first periapse altitude was calculated to be as low as 110km. The minimum periapse altitude considered survivable by MCO is 80km.

The MOI engine start occurred at 09:00:46 (UTC) on September 23, 1999. All systems performed nominally until Mars's occultation loss of signal at 09:04:52 (UTC), which occurred 49 seconds earlier than predicted. Signal was not reacquired following the 21 minute predicted occultation interval. Exhaustive attempts to reacquire the signal continued through September 25, 1999, but were unsuccessful.

On September 27, 1999, the operations navigation team consulted with the spacecraft engineers to discuss navigation discrepancies regarding velocity change (DV) modeling issues. On September 29, 1999, it was discovered that the small forces DV's reported by the spacecraft engineers for use in orbit determination solutions was[sic] low by a factor of 4.45."

—Taken from: Mars Climate Orbiter Mishap Investigation Board Phase I Report, NASA, November 10,1999.

Part III Questions:

  1. Insertion into the Mars atmosphere seemed to be at an altitude that was too low for the MCO to survive, less than the 80km. Why would 80km be a minimum altitude for survivability?

  2. While en route to Mars, periodic adjustments must be made to the MCO's flightpath. How would this be accomplished?

  3. What could be the cause of the discrepancies in the small forces DVs?

  4. How could this happen?

Go to Part IV: Mars Climate Orbiter Mishap Investigation


Home