Please Choose One
What's New | Conferences | Newsletters | Useful Websites | Search | Home

OLAC NEWSLETTER
Volume 11, Number 2
June 1991


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FROM THE TREASURER

ALA ANNUAL CONFERENCE MEETINGS

OLAC CONFERENCE 1992 CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS

MUSIC OCLC USERS' GROUP REPORT

BOOK REVIEWS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS


FROM THE TREASURER

Catherine Leonardi


       Reporting period:
       January 25, 1991 through April 29, 1991

       Account Balance January 25, 1991                      $8,289.35

       INCOME
          Interest                                              115.53
          Memberships                                         1,583.00
          CD Interest                                           368.55
          Mailing list                                          100.00
                                                           ------------
       TOTAL INCOME                                           2,167.08

       TOTAL                                                $10,456.43

       EXPENSES
          Newsletter v. 11, no. 1 (advance)                     900.00
          Bulk mail fee                                          75.00
                                                            ------------  
       TOTAL EXPENSES                                           975.00

       Account balance April 29, 1991                        $9,481.43
       CD at 8.10% matures 3/91                               6,000.00

       TOTAL OLAC ASSETS                                    $15,481.43

       Current membership = 606

Return to Table of Contents


ALA ANNUAL CONFERENCE MEETINGS OF INTEREST

Prepared by Cecilia Piccolo

Data are taken from preliminary conference schedules. Please confirm all dates and times in the final conference program.

OLAC

CC:DA

ALCTS AV COMMITTEE

ALCTS COMPUTER FILES DISCUSSION GROUP

MARBI

SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE

ALCTS--NATIONAL LIBRARIES REPORTING SESSION ALCTS--CCS PROGRAMS
ACRL AV / ALCTS AV / PLA AV PROGRAM Return to Table of Contents


OLAC CONFERENCE 1992 CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS

Submitted by Meredith Horan

Our next OLAC Conference will be held at the Holiday Inn Crowne Plaza, Rockville, Maryland, on October 1-3, 1992. The site is just north of Washington, D.C.; a short twenty-minute subway ride.

Diane Boehr, co-chairman for local arrangements, will be present at ALA and the OLAC Business Meeting to answer questions and seek suggestions on program topics.

To date, volunteers helping to organize the 1992 OLAC Conference include Lowell Ashley, music liaison for program planning; Cynthia Allen, registration and database manager; Kathy Winzer and Shakuntala Doshi, planning; and Ellie Wackerman, tours.

We are looking for a volunteer to be program chairman and someone to help with publicity. If you would like to assist in these areas, please call Meredith Horan at 301/496-5497.

Return to Table of Contents


MUSIC OCLC USERS' GROUP

REPORT ON ACTIVITIES

Submitted by Lowell Ashley, MOUG-OLAC Liaison

The MOUG-sponsored NACO Music Project has been expanded to include eight participants: Indiana University, Eastman School of Music, Northwestern University, University of California at San Diego, Stanford University, Yale University, University of Louisville, and Vassar College. The NMP is a cooperative effort to contribute MARC name/title authority records for musical works to the national authority file via a 'funneling" review process coordinated at Indiana University.

The University of California at San Diego is engaged in a special project to enter records for certain uniform titles for which @C authority records are not normally prepared under current Library of Congress guidelines. They have completed a series of records for works by Prokofiev and are now going to enter records for works by Beethoven.

A NACO Music Project Advisory Committee is now in place which will monitor all aspects of procedures and recommend future directions for the project.

A fourth edition of The Best of MOUG, a list of uniform titles for Bach, Mozart, and others, is expected to be available in early summer.

A MOUG membership directory was published as a special issue of the MOUG Newsletter in October, 1990.

The official MOUG archives was established in 1990 at the University of Maryland at College Park, which is also the repository for the archives of the Music Library Association.

The program of the MOUG annual meeting, held in Indianapolis, Indiana, on February 12-13, 1991, included an in-depth review of OCLC's EPIC Service by Robert Acker of DePaul University. A report of this presentation appears in the MOUG Newsletter, no. 47, April 1991.

Return to Table of Contents


BOOK REVIEWS

Anne A. Salter, Column Editor

Music Coding and Tagging: MARC Content Designation for Scores and Sound Recordings. Jay Weitz. Lake Crystal, Minnesota: Soldier Creek Press, 1990. (Soldier Creek Music Series, no. 2) 302 pp. ISBN 0936996366 $35.00.

Jennifer Bowen
Music Cataloger
Eastman School of Music


Subject Analysis in Online Catalogs. Rao Aluri, D. Alasdair Kemp, and John J. Boll. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited, 1991. 303 pp. ISBN 0-87287-670-5 $37.50.

Lonnie Beene
St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Texas


Issues in Online Database Searching. Carol Tenopir. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, 1989. (Database Searching Series, no. 1) 188 pp. ISBN: 087287-7094 $26.50.

Madeleine Johnson
Interim Head, Cataloging Department
California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo, CA

Return to Table of Contents


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Verna Urbanski, Column Editor

In a recent Music OCLC User Group Newsletter (no. 47, April 1991), Jay Weitz (OCLC) provided excellent guidance on handling dates for compact disc sound recordings. Since it is a question that comes up often during OLAC Q&A sessions, I thought it would be helpful to OLAC readers as well:

QUESTION: I often find Date Type/Dates Fixed Field errors in OLUC. Is there any way to encourage people to code them correctly, especially since incorrect data can hinder access to items?

ANSWER: Those fixed field elements are among the most confusing in the MARC format. The situation is not helped by compact discs that carry only the date of their original recording or release while giving no hint of the date of release in the CD format .... Consider all the dates found on the item, whether on the CD itself, the container, or the accompanying material, keeping in mind that the disc and label are the chief source of information. Remember also that CDs became commercially available in Japan in October 1982, in Europe in February 1983, and in the U.S. in March 1983. Use AACR2R 1.4F and 6.4F and their rule interpretations to determine the most reasonable date or set of dates. For CDs, it's useful to recall that 'c' copyright dates will usually refer to the printed material or artwork accompanying the disc; this date may be used to help estimate a publication or release date. A phonogram or "p" date is the copyright date of the recorded sound; if it predates the commercial availability dates of CDs, it obviously cannot be the publication or release date of the CD. In such cases, an approximate release date must be formulated using one of the various options outlined in 1.4F.
--Jay Weitz (OCLC)

Solinet Memorandum 1991-92 contained another interesting answer by Jay. It is especially useful since it provides some explanations that are helpful for those or us who are not music catalogers.

QUESTION: If the SPARS code on a compact disc is DAD, is the capture and storage technique (field 007 $n) considered to be digital or analog? We have a difference of opinion about whether a ... tape [that] is recorded [digitally] but [mixed using] analog mixing and editing [techniques] constitutes digital capture (yes) and storage (maybe not).

ANSWER: Frankly, I've never seen or heard of a recording coded DAD or anything other than the three standard combinations that are sometimes listed [on] CDs: DDD, ADD, and AAD. The three letters refer to the equipment used during [a recording] session (original recording, mixing and/or editing, and mastering (transcription)), respectively. In coding 007 $n, only the first letter of the code need be regarded, as it is the only one to indicate the original capture and storage technique. Any recording enhancements involving the subsequent mixing or editing (the second letter of the code) or mastering (the third letter), can be ignored here. The apparent illogic of using analog equipment for mixing and editing, but digital equipment for everything else make me wonder if the 'DAD" is simply an abbreviation for "digital audio disc," as is (sort of) suggested by Carole Franklin Vidali on p. 28 of The Acquisition and Cataloging of Music and Sound Recordings: A Glossary, by Suzanne E. Thorin and Vidali (MIA Technical Report no. 11.)
--Jay Weitz (OCLC)

QUESTION: Is it possible for a series to be a corporate body and vice versa? 'My question is in reference to Columbia University Seminars on Media and Society. It seems that the Seminar does function as a producer, yet, I think it would be appropriate to consider the seminar as a series. The programs are meant to stand alone much like a National Geographic Special.

ANSWER: LCRI 1.6 contains a section titled 'Series titles consisting solely of a corporate body's name' which demonstrates that a corporate body's name can be treated as a series when it is used with a number. The online authority file treats Media and Society Seminars as a corporate body. When cataloging their "Ethics in America" set recently, I treated Media and Society Seminars as a corporate added entry with the full form of the name in the area of responsibility, as below:

The summary note on this catalog description mentions that it was originally shown as a series on PBS. The LC authority record establishes Media and Society Seminars as a corporate body responsible for the production of the titles, so I would not treat this corporate body as a series.

It can be confusing to look for help on OCLC member records, because we do find a variety of treatments for the same corporate body. Usually, it is best to check to see how the information is presented on the item itself, how the name is treated on the LC authority record, and then how other OCLC members have treated the name. There is a caveat when using OCLC member copy as sample cataloging to help decide questions like this. Keep in mind that not all catalogers actually view the item to transcribe production details from the piece. Information presented on accompanying material and the cassette case can be pretty ambiguous until the credits are consulted. It is also possible to discover 'false patterns of usage." This is when you can tell, after viewing the credits, that a number of cataloging records are following a pattern established without consulting the credits. Usually this is within the cataloging of one institution, but you also see other institutions copying the pattern set by another.
--VU

QUESTION: Does one trace Conference XYZ as a subject when cataloging the proceedings of Conference XYZ? Might it be argued that the Conference is the "subject" of its own proceedings?

ANSWER: No. The proceedings of a conference are the formal content of what happened during the time the conference was in session. Subject analysis tries to reflect what items are about. The proceedings are not "about' the conference but are the conference. It is an old cataloging battle to keep "are-ness" and 'about-ness" straight (which is one reason the Library of Congress subject heading manuals are so very useful).
--VU

QUESTION: I notice that the Dat tp explanation for the subfield p has changed in the latest revision (rev.9102) of the OCLC audiovisual format (MED FF:8). Does this mean that we will be seeing a lot more Dat tp p codes and a lot fewer Dat tp r and s?

ANSWER: Yes, that is what it means and purely because this explanation will help clear the way for proper application. The addition says:


       Imprint                           Dat tp           Dates
       New York: MGM/CBS                 p                1981,1964
       Home Video

       Note
       Originally produced as a motion picture in 1964.
This addition helps when we look at the code r explanation (at (7)) to treat a motion picture re-released as a video as a new work. Before the additional guidance at code p, many catalogers created a new record for the item, but coded the new work with Dat tp r. The new paragraph should make at least this one thing easier for catalogers!!

--VU

Return to Table of Contents
Top


Last modified: December 1997
URL: http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/units/cts/olac/newsletters/...
HTML version created by Brenda Battleson ( blb@acsu.buffalo.edu)
Return to OLAC Newsletter index