Three-dimensional artifacts and naturally occurring objects
OLAC Executive Board Meeting minutes
Research in Progress
Book Reviews
Questions & Answers
OLAC EXECUTIVE BOARD AND STANDING COMMITTEE CHAIR 1986-1987
INDEX TO OLAC NEWSLETTER COMING SOON
OLAC CATALOGING POLICY COMMITTEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE REPORT
OLAC EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING MINUTES
NEW DIRECTIONS IN SUBJECT ACCESS TO NONBOOK MATERIALS
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ARTIFACTS AND NATURALLY OCCURRING OBJECTS
RTSD AUDIOVISUAL COMMITTEE BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES
INSTITUTIONS CHOSEN FOR THE THIRD ROUND OF ENHANCE
This issue naturally focuses on a busy and productive ALA annual conference in New York City. Minutes of two OLAC meetings and the RTSD AV business meeting are included as well as a summary of the very successful RTSD AV program meeting, New Directions in Subject Access to Nonbook Materials.
Two new features are introduced in this issue: News about Members and Research in Progress. Both columns will appear whenever contributions are received. I would be very interested in receiving comments about the utility and appropriateness of these two features.
We are also running registration forms for the OLAC Conference at OCLC once again in this issue for those of you who have not yet decided to take advantage of an interesting and very worthwhile program. Aside from the obvious benefits for those wishing to increase their expertise in nonbook cataloging, the program offers a chance to discuss theoretical issues that will shape the future of nonbook cataloging and interesting tours, especially the opportunity to see OCLC headquarters.
One final, exciting, development to note is the forthcoming cumulative index of the OLAC Newsletter. This index, which will probably appear sometime this fall, should greatly enhance the usefulness and scholarly value of the Newsletter. The index is currently being prepared by Verna Urbanski and Bobby Ferguson. More details are available in the announcement elsewhere in this issue of the Newsletter.
It seems a strange time of year to be writing a New Year's message (especially with the temperature at 98 today) but that is essentially what these paragraphs are. Having rung out the old year with a celebration of OLAC's founding at ALA in New York a few weeks ago, we begin OLAC's seventh year. I would be remiss not to mention the accomplishments of OLAC in 1985-86 under the capable leadership of Katha Massey and an outstanding board. A few highlights from a busy year include: Sheila Intner's address to the OCLC User's Council; OLAC's recognition by OCLC as the official group representing cataloging issues regarding computer materials; a very full agenda for Verna Urbanski's Cataloging Policy Committee including many proposals which were accepted by ALA's Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access; a smooth transition to a new and talented newsletter staff headed by Grace Agnew.
The upcoming year holds the promise of being both exciting and challenging. The excitement comes in the form of our November 6-7 meeting at OCLC. Those of us who heard Donald Bidd's presentation at ALA in New York on the National Film Board of Canada's Precis subject access system found him to be an excellent speaker. We are looking forward to his keynote address, as we are also anticipating an interesting presentation by Shirley Lewis, the second keynote speaker. To fill out the program there is an array of choices from tours of OCLC to workshops on topics of current interest in audiovisual cataloging. A registration form for the OLAC OCLC meeting is provided with this issue. The challenge for OLAC is to provide ongoing support for catalogers faced with implementing the new chapter 9 of AACR next year. To that end we have begun plans for a half-day workshop on cataloging microcomputer software for the ALA Annual Conference in San Francisco next summer. OLAC's new Vice-Chair/Chair Elect, J.O. Wallace, will be planning this very timely program.
In OLAC's brief history as an organization, much has been accomplished and in every measurable way OLAC is a thriving organization thanks to the hard work and high interest of OLAC members around the country. The coming year looks like no exception to the record of success OLAC has enjoyed.
Reporting period:
April 16, 1986 through July 14, 1986
Account balance April 16, 1986 $4,427.45
INCOME
Interest on regular account 64.69
U.S. postal refund 21.39
New memberships (27) 254.00
(8 US I, 16 US P, 2 non-US I, 1 non-US P")
Renewal memberships (6) 86.00
(4 US I1 2 US P*)
Back issues 8.75
-------------
TOTAL INCOME 434.83
TOTAL $4,862.28
EXPENSES
Newsletter v. 6, no. 2
(Includes $50. editor stipend) 790.03
ALA NY expenses (partial)
Board dinner 162.78
Board stipends 250.00
Marbi stipend 100.00
OLAC reception 325.00
OLAC founder's award plaque 146.60
Additional postage for mailing newsletter 9.17
------------
TOTAL EXPENSES $1,783.58
Account balance July 14, 1986 $3,078.70
CD at 7.0% matures 7/87 5,000.00
TOTAL OLAC ASSETS $8,078.70
CURRENT MEMBERSHIP: 546
________________________________
* I = Institutional member
P = Personal member
CHAIR: TREASURER:
Richard Thaxter Head, Catherine Leonardi
Audiovisual Section 3604 Suffolk
Special Materials Cataloging Division Durham, NC 27707
Library of Congress
Washington, DC 20540
VICE CHAIR/CHAIR ELECT: SECRETARY:
James O. Wallace Susie Koch
P.O. Box 13041 Head of Technical Services
San Antonio, TX 78213 Pasadena Public Library
285 E. Walnut St
Pasadena, CA 91101
PAST CHAIR: CHAIR, CAPC COMMITTEE:
Katha Massey Dorian Martyn
Cataloging Department Corporate Technical Library
University of Georgia Libraries The Upjohn Company
Athens, GA 30602 Kalamazoo, MI 49001
Marilyn Craig CC:DA Audience Observer 1986-1988 Bibliographic Control Dept. University of Houston Libraries 4800 Calhoun Blvd. Houston, TX 77004 Barbara Ritchie Chair of Ad Hoc 1985-1986 OCLC OCLC Conference Local Systems Committee 6565 Frantz Road Dublin, OH 43017 Sheila Smyth RTSD Audiovisual 1986-1988 Nazareth College of Rochester Committee Liaison Library P.O. Box 3906 Rochester, NY 14610-0996 Bo-Gay Tong MARBI Liaison 1986-1988 Orion User Services University Research Library UCLA 405 Hilgard Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90024
Verna Urbanski, University of North Florida, and Anna (Bobby) Ferguson, Louisiana State Library, have been hard at work creating an index to the first five volumes of the OLAC Newsletter. The project is nearing completion, and we hope to mail it out to all current members this Fall. A notice will be put in the newsletter when the mail out takes place. Please DO NOT CLAIM a copy of the index until you see the mail out notice in the newsletter. As with most projects, it is being completed in what can laughingly be called "spare time." Information on ordering extra copies or receiving a copy when membership is not current will be available in the announcement.
--- Verna Urbanski
NOW IS THE TIME TO NOMINATE outstanding librarians for the 1987 Annual OLAC Award.
This award, which will be given for the first time at the OLAC Membership Meeting in San Francisco in the summer of 1987, honors a librarian who has made significant contributions to the advancement and understanding of audiovisual cataloging. The Awards Committee will select a recipient from among those nominated at their Midwinter meeting, to be approved by the OLAC Executive Board.
Eligibility for nomination is as follows:
Kindly send all nominations, by 15th November, to:
Dr. Sheila S, Intner, Chair
OLAC Annual Award Committee
Graduate School of Library & Information Science
Simmons College
300 The Fenway
Boston, MA 02115
Online Audiovisual Catalogers, Inc., (OLAC) seeks to recognize and honor librarians who have made significant contributions to the advancement and understanding of audiovisual cataloging, including related matters of MARC coding and tagging as well as interpretation of cataloging rules and policy on the national and international levels.
An award consisting of an engraved plaque shall be presented to an individual annually. Individuals considered for the award shall be selected on the basis of their outstanding contributions, both recent and sustained, to audiovisual cataloging.
Nominees may come from within or without OLAC's membership. A call for nominations shall appear in the third quarter issue of the OLAC Newsletter. Deadline for nominations shall be November 15 of each year. Nominations must be accompanied by statements of the qualifications of the nominee with supporting evidence.
The OLAC Award shall be administered by an Awards Committee, consisting of three OLAC members, no more than two of whom may be members of the OLAC Executive Board. The OLAC Chair shall sign the letter of presentation and present the award to the recipient at the OLAC Annual Membership Meeting.
The Awards Committee shall consider all nominations and recommend a recipient to the Board at its first meeting during the Midwinter Meeting. The Board shall have the authority to confirm the recommendation or return it to the Committee and direct them to make another selection. Should the Board choose the latter course, reasons for doing so shall be given. If, in any given year, no nominee shall be considered sufficiently worthy by the Committee to be recommended, or, should all recommendations of the Committee be returned by the Board, no award shall be made for that year.
The meeting was held in the New York Hilton, June 27, 1986, at 8:00 p.m. Following introductions, the minutes of the Midwinter meeting were approved as circulated. Chair, Verna Urbanski, passed out copies of the final agenda, recently received copies of the amended version of Chapter 9, and a discussion document concerning the addition of sound characteristics to the physical description for videorecordings.
Non-print Serials:
Respectfully submitted,
Susie Koch
For the past two years, members of the Cataloging Policy Committee of OLAC have been looking at a variety of approaches to create a universally applicable AV cataloging manual. A survey conducted by Laurel Jizba during her term as Chair of OLAC had indicated that the membership was interested in OLAC producing such a manual. Committee member John Lashbrook put a lot of effort into the beginning designs for a cataloging template to be used on a microcomputer. Member Dorian Martyn generated questions based on her cataloging manual created for the University of Miami School of Medicine. Repeatedly the members of the committee assigned to work on the project kept running into the thorny question of how to make the manual meaningful without making it utility-specific. General sets of cataloging principles, samples and guidelines are available from many sources. Likewise, general organizational/managerial information exists in easily attainable forms. Combining these basic facts with the amount of time members of the Committee could devote to the project made production of a useful tool a risky business. To the disappointment of many, the Committee is setting aside this project for the foreseeable future. If at some future time the Committee members feel able to tackle a project of this size, it is still out there waiting to be done. Many thanks are due to Dorian and John for all their work on the initial project. Also thanks to the OLAC Executive Board for their guidance.
Verna Urbanski
Immediate Past-Chair, CAPC
Minutes of the June 28, 1986 OLAC Business Meeting will appear
in the next issue (Vol. 6, no. 4) of
the OLAC Newsletter.
***********************************************************************
--- Submitted by Toni Snee and Grace Agnew
Sponsored by RTSD Audiovisual Committee, RTSD/CCS Subject Analysis Committee, and ACRL/RBMS Standards Committee and moderated by Carol Mandel, University of California at San Diego, the program consisted of five papers focusing on automated systems which integrate subject access to books and to non-print media, and other systems developed for specific media such as prints and photographs, films and music.
Susan Nesbitt, Hennepin County Government Center, spoke on the subject access used at her library, the decision-making process for establishing new headings, and the depth of subject access provided for materials in the collection.
Elisabeth Betz-Parker, Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress, gave a history of subject access to the LC Print Collection, and discussed the problems of providing more specific headings than LCSH allows and of identifying items with no text, label, date, or other clue.
Donald Bidd, National Film Board of Canada, gave an in-depth introduction to the PRECIS indexing system in use at the NFB and other film collections throughout Canada. He explained how the indexing string is derived and covered the strengths, weaknesses and future of the system.
Brad Young, University of Illinois, discussed access to music materials through PRECIS, through the MARC Music format and its separate fields for retrieval of data for instrumentation and voice, and through the new Dewey 780 schedule to be included in the 20th edition of DDC.
Karen Markey, OCLC Office of Research, discussed iconographical research collections and their use by art historians through such subject accessing and classification schemes as Iconclass, the Marburger Index, the Princeton Index and others.
--- Submitted by Bobby Ferguson
A meeting was held April 8 at the Library of Congress on adding specifications for three-dimensional artifacts and naturally occurring objects to the USMARC Visual Materials Format. Those invited to attend were:
A preliminary meeting had been held at LC in September, 1985, during which representatives from the Washington D.C. area reviewed specifications prepared by Phyllis Bruns. During that meeting it was, decided an 007 would not be used for three-dimensional materials, a decision with which we all agreed.
We were reminded that LC does not catalog any materials which come within the scope of AACR 2 chapter 10, the chapter under consideration in this format expansion. It is not likely that LC will catalog these items within the foreseeable future.
Many of the fields and values which we agreed should be added to the format are for archival use. Some, however, will see more general use.
A discussion of applicable GMD's proved interesting, as Jean Weihs pointed out we may use the GMD "art original" for materials in chapter 10 as well as for those in chapter 8. A rule interpretation for 8.5B1 (CSB 10, 11, 25) lists chapter 8 GMD's with specific material designations distributed appropriately. That LCRI does not include "art original," though it is listed in 1.1C1 as a GMD with the others cited in the LCRI. 8.5B1 does list the term. 10.5B1 does not list "art original" though the definition in the glossary says "The original two- or three-dimensional work of art ..." Therefore we may use this term as appropriate, whether cataloging a two-dimensional art work, or a three-dimensional one.
"Art reproduction" is not a GMD, but is included in the list of specific material designations in 8.5B1. We felt this should also be a GMD, and that we should be permitted to use it for both chapter 8 and chapter 10 materials. JSC will consider adding this term to the list of GMD's at its fall meeting.
Other changes which will be proposed to MARBI include changes to accommodate BC dates, a field in which to code patent registration numbers, and a field for taxonomic identification.
The meeting was funded by the Council for Library Resources.
--- Submitted by Nancy B. Olson
The meeting was called to order by the Chair, Martha Yee, at 2 p.m. in Diplomat Room A of the Sheraton Centre Hotel, New York, N.Y. Members of the Committee (including new appointments) and observers introduced themselves, and corrections to the committee roster were made. Bruce Johnson is the Committee's incoming chair. Minutes of the previous meeting were approved as distributed.
Having no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4 p.m.
--- Submitted by Katha Massey
This issue of the Newsletter inaugurates a new feature, Research in Progress, designed to acquaint OLAC members with research or special projects of interest to audiovisual catalogers before results are published in the library literature. The Newsletter welcomes any submissions for this column, which should be sent to Grace Agnew, Editor-in-Chief, at the address on the Newsletter masthead.
Two hundred and ten (210) valid responses were received in a recent survey of online systems in academic libraries. Twenty-five (25) of 207 respondents had online public access catalogs. One catalog was developed in-house, 16 were vendor turnkey systems, 4 were a combination of one or more types, 2 were provided by a bibliographic utility and 2 belonged to the "other" category. Twelve (12) respondents had possessed an online catalog less than one year; eleven (11), 1-5 years; and one (1) more than 5 years.
One online catalog utilizes a microcomputer, 12 utilize a minicomputer, and 12 utilize a mainframe computer. Six (6) respondents provide no backup for the catalog, 11 provide hardcopy backup, 6 provide microform backup, 1 provides a diskette, and 1 provides other backup.
Six (6) online catalogs include authority control, 15 plan this feature and 4 systems do not have this feature, All 25 catalogs are searchable by author or title, 20 are searchable by subject, 19 by a combination of author and title, 13 by keyword, 22 by call numbers, 22 by other identification numbers and 14 by boolean operators. Six (6) catalogs include set logic. One hundred and nineteen (119) of 183 respondents plan an online catalog in the future.
--- Submitted by Grace Agnew
Bibliography of National Filmographies. Dorothea Gebauer, Harriet W. Harrison, ed. Brussels: FIAF, 1985.
Listings under each country are arranged by type of material and include books, periodicals, and unpublished works.
No index is provided. The typescript is sometimes faint due to poor reproduction. The non-standardized diacritics and romanization are somewhat frustrating to the reader.
The main benefit of this volume would be to film archives or large library film collections of international scope. It would be a useful tool in researching titles from countries where documentation is scarce. The title is recommended for libraries with extensive international film holdings and for film archives of a similar nature.
The membership is OLAC's greatest resource. To facilitate sharing among members, the Newsletter is introducing a new column devoted to news about members, in particular job changes, promotions, new responsibilities and awards. Due to time constraints for the Newsletter staff, all items for this column must be submitted by members. We are unable to search library literature for news about members and must rely solely on submissions. For this reason, we apologize if any recent job changes, promotions, etc., are omitted. Submissions for this column should be addressed to Bobbie DeCoster, News and Articles Editor.
Sound Recordings Format:
QUESTION: I am confused about how to code the 041 when you have a dubbed film.
ANSWER: Accurate coding of LANG and 041 is very important to
the indexing of the record. It may help to remember that for type g
material LANG is the language of the sound track of accompanying sound.
The language of the "title page" has no bearing on the coding of the
041. The language of a dubbed film would be handled under category (1) in
the 041 explanation (MED 0:56), that is, the language of the sound
track.
--- Glenn Patton
QUESTION: Does computer animation count in the TECH coding of the fixed field as an animation technique? A lot of the videocassettes I've cataloged lately have had short segments of computer animation to illustrate concepts discussed in an otherwise live action item.
ANSWER: If you know there is animation of any kind on the
videocassette, it is more accurate to use code "c" (animation and live
action) than to use "i" (live action).
--- Glenn Patton
QUESTION: I need advice on describing components of kits (type: o). I understand how field 300 would be transcribed if you wished no further description, for example: 4 filmstrips, 4 sound cassettes, 22 study prints, etc.
But if you did wish to elaborate on the physical description I don't see how that would be possible in a single 300. Would this information be put in one or more 500 note(s) for each component, for example:
ANSWER: As you noted it is not possible when cataloging under AACR 2 to elaborate on the component parts of a kit in a single physical description. In revised Chapter 12 of AACR 1 it was possible to do this and it is a technique missed by many AV catalogers (see pages 19-20 of Chapter 12 rev.--If you still have it around!!!!).
If you wish to give a physical description of each component
part, do so in a note. Follow the standard descriptive pattern for that
media when cataloged alone. I would put all such descriptions together in
one note rather than using a separate note for each and would separate
them using a period space dash dash space technique as used in 1.10C3.
OCLC's Technical Bulletin no. 161 issued June 1986,
indicates that field 300 is now repeatable for " the recording of
multiple physical descriptions for kits, original or historical graphic
materials, and archival moving-image materials" (page 10). Please note
that only the first 300 in a multiple set of physical descriptions will
print on catalog cards (see TB 164).
--- Verna Urbanski
QUESTION: Is it correct to input an ISBN in the 028 field in lieu of an absent publisher's number on a cassette? I have seen this done on some records and think it is a good idea; however, theoretically, the ISBN belongs in the 020 field.
ANSWER: The ISBN should not go in a 028. When you see this use, it should be reported as an error. In OCLC, the 020 and the 028 each index in different indexes. Inputting an ISBN in an 028 field would result in a search of the wrong retrieval index which would lead to a zero search response.
Examine the recorded sound format to see the very different capabilities of these two fields. Each in its own way is a powerful search tool. It would be ill-advised to violate the integrity of either of these indexes with inappropriate indexing keys. Since the 020 is available in the sound recording format, there is no reason to use the 028 rather than the 020 for the ISBN.
It is good to check things like this out before doing them on
your cataloging. Always remember that member copy reflects varying
levels of expertise. Non-print cataloging is often the stepchild in
cataloging departments so the quality is
especially suspect. It is always best to question a procedure rather
than to adopt it just because you find it on OCLC member copy.
--- Verna Urbanski
QUESTION: Is there a way to handle videorecordings which have been recorded in stereo. I see no examples of this in AACR 2, but am seeing it done on OCLC member input records. The ones I have seen are saying "sd., col., stereo," in subfield b of the 300 field. It seems to me that at the very least the term "stereo" should follow "sd."
ANSWER: You are correct that AACR 2 has not provided for this
use. For now, I would suggest using a note for this information. For
example: Recorded in stereo. I have reservations about whether it
should be mentioned at all. Will we get ourselves into a situation where
we say "sd. (mono), col." on videorecordings? This brings up visions of
the analog/digital notation in the 300 field of sound recordings that is
being used incorrectly so often. Dick Thaxter of LC says that they,
informally, do as you suggest, that is, they say: sd. (stereo.), col. ;
... Please note that a difference in sound recording technique should
not be deemed as a reason to input a new record.
--- Verna Urbanski
QUESTION: According to AACR 2 24.1B, works for bodies are entered under the name used at the time of publication. We recently cataloged Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde which was made in 1920. On the piece itself the credits named Famous Players-Lasky as the production company. This heading is listed on LC NAR 79055407 (code d) as a 410 20, but considered in a 667 as a valid AACR 2 heading. (See also LC NAR 79055404.) For our use we made Famous Players-Lasky Corporation a heading with a see also to Paramount Pictures Corporation. Is this the proper procedure?
ANSWER: The name forms given in the 667 are anticipated AACR 2
forms of earlier names. When and if LC catalogs a title having one of
these forms of the name, they will establish at that time a name
authority record for the name in question. The form in the 667 is the
probable form they will use. It appears on the current authority record
as a 410 20 rather than a 510 20 because LC has not yet had a title
requiring use of the name so it can't be a see also. It is not
guaranteed to be the form LC will eventually use for the name, but I
would not feel uncomfortable using it on my cataloging. Whether or not
you make a see also for your catalogs depends on whether you have entries
in your catalog at Paramount Pictures Corporation.
--- Verna Urbanski
QUESTION: How should I indicate that the videotape I am cataloging is recorded according to the PAL standard? All U.S. videotapes are recorded in the NTSC standard, but this is never explicitly stated in standard cataloging.
ANSWER: Rule 7.5B1 is rather confusing, It is hard to know
what to put in a note and what to put in the 300. When I am in doubt
about this question I defer to a note. People wanting to use my copy can
easily delete my note and move the information to the physical
description. The important thing is not to invest too much cataloging
time on questions of this type. I would suggest a note in the form "VHS
format, PAL standard."
--- Verna Urbanski
QUESTION: I am cataloging transparency masters and don't know what to use for a GMD and SMD. Using transparency for a GMD just doesn't seem right when you don't really have that until you make it. Also, transparency master isn't listed as a SMD at rule 8.5B1.
ANSWER: Using transparency as a GMD would be misleading. Nancy
Olson advises in the 2nd edition of her book (p. 154) to catalog without
a GMD for this material. I concur. The last sentence of rule 8.5B1 has
an option that allows for a more specific term to be used as an SMD if
none from the provided list suits.
--- Verna Urbanski
Membership in Online Audiovisual Catalogers is available for single or multiple years. The membership year is from January 1 through December 31. Membership includes a subscription to OLAC Newsletter. Membership rates are:
single year - US - $7.00 personal ; $13.00 institutional
Non-US - $9.00 personal ; $15.00 institutional
two year - US - $13.00 personal ; $25.00 institutional
Non-US - $17.00 personal ; $29.00 institutional
three year - US - $18.00 personal ; $36.00 institutional
Non-US - $24.00 personal ; $42.00 institutional
An index will appear in Fall 1986. This is the reason for the price increase. It will be an annual cumulative index. Payment in US funds only, please. Make check payable to ONLINE AUDIOVISUAL CATALOGERS and mail to:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TO APPLY FOR MEMBERSHIP IN OLAC OR TO RENEW YOUR MEMBERSHIP
XEROX THE FORM BELOW
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Circle the correct information:
I wish to ( renew my membership in // join ) OLAC I am enclosing : $7 $9 $13 $15 for 1987 $13 $17 $25 $29 for 1987/1988 $18 $24 $36 $42 for 1987/1988/1989
CHECK HERE IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR NAME ON A MAILING LIST WHICH IS SOLD TO AV RELATED ORGANIZATIONS ___
NAME:
ADDRESS:
is a quarterly publication of Online Audiovisual Cataloger, Inc. appearing in March, June, September, and December.
Missing issues must be claimed no later than three months after the month of issue. Claiming deadlines are: June 30 (March issue); September 30 (June issue); December 31 (September issue); and March 31 (December issue.)
ISSN: 0739-1153
OLAC Newsletter EDITORIAL STAFF
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF PRODUCTION EDITOR
Grace Agnew Sharon Grieggs Almquist
Swilley Library Willis Library
Mercer University Atlanta P.O. Box 5188
3001 Mercer University Dr. North Texas State University
Atlanta, GA 30341 Denton, TX 76203
NEWS AND ARTICLES EDITOR CONFERENCE REPORTS EDITOR
Barbara L. DeCoster Ann S. (Bobby) Ferguson
Library Media Center Louisiana State Library
Bellvue Community College 760 Riverside North
300 Landerholm Circle S.E. P.O. Box 131
Bellvue, WA 98007 Baton Rouge, LA 70821
BOOK REVIEW EDITOR QUESTIONS & ANSWERS EDITOR
Anne A. Salter Verna Urbanski
Atlanta Historical Society Thomas G. Carpenter Library
3101 Andrews Dr. University of North Florida
Atlanta, GA 30305 P.O. Box 17605
Jacksonville, FL 32245-7605
Materials for publication in the OLAC Newsletter should be sent to the appropriate editor. Persons wishing to review books are invited to write to Anne Salter indicating their special areas of interest and qualifications. For AV cataloging questions, contact Verna Urbanski. Articles should be typed, double spaced, and consistent in length and style with other items published in the Newsletter. The submission deadline for the December issue is October 25, 1986.
For membership renewal and change of address contact:
For general information about OLAC, contact:
Permission is granted to copy and disseminate information contained herein, provided the source is acknowledged.
Return to Table of Contents
Top
Last modified: December 1997
URL: http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/units/cts/olac/newsletters/...
HTML version created by Brenda Battleson (
blb@acsu.buffalo.edu)
Return to OLAC Newsletter index